Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clock identification
06-30-2009, 02:01 PM
Post: #1
Clock identification
Hello.
I have been restoring / conserving clocks for about 10 years now.
I have an Anniversary clock that needs a suspension spring, but it does not have any significant markings except "Made in Germany" under the ceramic dial, and more importantly, has 116/1294 scratched under the brass base.
I have attached two pictures.
I would like to know something about the clock and especially what suspension spring to use.
I had a friend give me a suspension spring (0.033") to try and it is quite a bit fast and cannot be regulated.
I assume that it requires a thicker spring.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Regards,

Steve


Attached File(s)
.jpg  Clives_400Day_01a.jpg (Size: 33.68 KB / Downloads: 18)
.jpg  Clives_400Day_02a.jpg (Size: 35.19 KB / Downloads: 15)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-30-2009, 03:30 PM
Post: #2
RE: Clock identification
Hello.
I should also have mentioned that this is my first 400 day clock, and that the suspension spring I have tried is 0.0033".
Thanks for any assistance.

Regards,

Steve
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-01-2009, 04:17 AM (This post was last modified: 07-01-2009 04:29 AM by jeules0.)
Post: #3
RE: Clock identification
Hi, I've looked in the Horolovar 400 day Repair guide for you, and as far as I can see your backplate matches a c1932 Kern & Link plate no 1667 which uses a 0.0036"/0.091mm spring. However, I believe I'm right in saying the thicker the spring, the faster it will go so not quite sure what to suggest assuming the 4 pendulum balls are at their outer limit?! The dial too is similar to Becker and other anniversary clocks of the late 20s/early 30s. Hope this helps but you may want to check my info as I am still learning about these clocks myself. Regards Chris
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-01-2009, 11:32 AM
Post: #4
RE: Clock identification
(07-01-2009 04:17 AM)jeules0 Wrote:  Hi, I've looked in the Horolovar 400 day Repair guide for you, and as far as I can see your backplate matches a c1932 Kern & Link plate no 1667 which uses a 0.0036"/0.091mm spring. However, I believe I'm right in saying the thicker the spring, the faster it will go so not quite sure what to suggest assuming the 4 pendulum balls are at their outer limit?! The dial too is similar to Becker and other anniversary clocks of the late 20s/early 30s. Hope this helps but you may want to check my info as I am still learning about these clocks myself. Regards Chris

Thanks for the info Chris.
I think that I meant that the clock is running slow, and that a thicker spring will speed it up.
I have tried adjusting the pendulum balls to no avail.

Regards,

Steve
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-05-2009, 06:23 AM
Post: #5
RE: Clock identification
Hi, I think this document relates to the movement in your clock:
http://www.anniversaryclocks.org/aci/ksstd.pdf

I can't see from your photo if you have two screwholes at the bottom of the backplate or not. These are for the slightly later model that has a locking bracket to support the pendulum. This alters the unit used, but the wire should be the same, size 0.0036" Horolovar. If you are using a Horolovar 0.0033" then this will make the clock slow; too slow to be compensated by the adjuster.

Regards, Mervyn
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-05-2009, 06:45 AM
Post: #6
RE: Clock identification
Thanks for the infomation Chris and Mervyn.
Mine is the earlier version without the screw holes for the bracket.
Regards,

Steve
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump: