|
Clock identification
|
|
06-30-2009, 02:01 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clock identification
Hello.
I have been restoring / conserving clocks for about 10 years now. I have an Anniversary clock that needs a suspension spring, but it does not have any significant markings except "Made in Germany" under the ceramic dial, and more importantly, has 116/1294 scratched under the brass base. I have attached two pictures. I would like to know something about the clock and especially what suspension spring to use. I had a friend give me a suspension spring (0.033") to try and it is quite a bit fast and cannot be regulated. I assume that it requires a thicker spring. Thanks in advance for any assistance. Regards, Steve |
|||
|
06-30-2009, 03:30 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Clock identification
Hello.
I should also have mentioned that this is my first 400 day clock, and that the suspension spring I have tried is 0.0033". Thanks for any assistance. Regards, Steve |
|||
|
07-01-2009, 04:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-01-2009 04:29 AM by jeules0.)
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Clock identification
Hi, I've looked in the Horolovar 400 day Repair guide for you, and as far as I can see your backplate matches a c1932 Kern & Link plate no 1667 which uses a 0.0036"/0.091mm spring. However, I believe I'm right in saying the thicker the spring, the faster it will go so not quite sure what to suggest assuming the 4 pendulum balls are at their outer limit?! The dial too is similar to Becker and other anniversary clocks of the late 20s/early 30s. Hope this helps but you may want to check my info as I am still learning about these clocks myself. Regards Chris
|
|||
|
07-01-2009, 11:32 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Clock identification
(07-01-2009 04:17 AM)jeules0 Wrote: Hi, I've looked in the Horolovar 400 day Repair guide for you, and as far as I can see your backplate matches a c1932 Kern & Link plate no 1667 which uses a 0.0036"/0.091mm spring. However, I believe I'm right in saying the thicker the spring, the faster it will go so not quite sure what to suggest assuming the 4 pendulum balls are at their outer limit?! The dial too is similar to Becker and other anniversary clocks of the late 20s/early 30s. Hope this helps but you may want to check my info as I am still learning about these clocks myself. Regards Chris Thanks for the info Chris. I think that I meant that the clock is running slow, and that a thicker spring will speed it up. I have tried adjusting the pendulum balls to no avail. Regards, Steve |
|||
|
07-05-2009, 06:23 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Clock identification
Hi, I think this document relates to the movement in your clock:
http://www.anniversaryclocks.org/aci/ksstd.pdf I can't see from your photo if you have two screwholes at the bottom of the backplate or not. These are for the slightly later model that has a locking bracket to support the pendulum. This alters the unit used, but the wire should be the same, size 0.0036" Horolovar. If you are using a Horolovar 0.0033" then this will make the clock slow; too slow to be compensated by the adjuster. Regards, Mervyn |
|||
|
07-05-2009, 06:45 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Clock identification
Thanks for the infomation Chris and Mervyn.
Mine is the earlier version without the screw holes for the bracket. Regards, Steve |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help


